fix(sandbox): use Daytona code execution API - #175
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Production research PDF generation still returned
Sandbox returned invalid artifact metadataafter moving binary output out of stdout. Live sandbox diagnostics showed the deeper cause: the document renderer never executed. The customrunCodetransport base64-encoded source into environment chunks and reconstructed it through a shell pipeline, but Daytona process execution did not inject those chunks, so Node received an empty program and exited successfully with no output.What changed
s native/process/code-run` APIs documentedenvs` wire fieldArchitecture / migration effects
Verification
pnpm lintpnpm typecheckpnpm turbo build --forcepnpm deadcode(passes; four existing Knip configuration hints remain)pnpm architecture:checkpnpm turbo skills:buildfrom __future__semantics intactLocal verification used Node 26.4.0 while the repository pins Node 24.18.0; pnpm emitted the existing engine warning, and all checks passed.